NT reviewr (2)
Gospel of John
1. “I am”
a. Book of Signs: “I am the predicate”
b. Book of Glory: “I am”; Moses echo; irony Jesus’ suffers
2. Xtology: high (starts with logos)
3. Minipoints
a. Explicated the implied themes of synoptics (e.g. Jesus as God)
b. Jesus seems not human: more human since he cried, he asks for love
c. Theological reflection in narrative form
d. Philosophical
e. Naming Jesus makes the namer subordinate (John the Baptist); He named himself… I am.
f. Symbol: Jesus himself is the symbol of heaven realities as kingdom of heaven is to synoptics
g. Full of irony: characters say things without realizing the weight of their words à reader elevation. (e.g. Pontius Pilate “What is the truth?”
Johanin Letters
- regarding the inner conflict within the community
- 1st John: doctrinal and moral disagreements; more of a homily
- 2nd John: proper teachings
- 3rd John: political teachings
Revelation
- not a foretelling, apocaplyptic literature
a. persecution literature
b. esoteric code
c. seems to foretell but it is intended for the present
d. God is incontrol of History
§ Good-evil = won already
§ Suffering = part of God’s plan
§ Human history has a goal = judgment
§ Sufferers with Xt will share in his glory
- realized eschatology - a saved already (e.g. Corinthians’ )
- very Jewish: suffering speeds up actualization of God’s glory
- made sense to its first audience – the persecuted
- read, think metaphorically
ACTS
1. Pattern of Moses’ Story
- Moses in weakness, rejected (Jesus human weakness)
- Moses in power, rejected (Jesus resurrection and HSP)
- Rejected are rejected (move to Gentiles
2. doubtful Gentiles:
a. Is god faithful to his promises?
à Luke: fulfilled in the restored Israel (jews who accepted Jesus)
b. Sino and leader? Sanhedrin or apostles
à Apostles may power and authority
3. Tower of Babel vs. PENTECOST
a. story of arrogance and pride vs. story of hope
b. division/barrier vs. unitive
c. divided vs. preached
4. Paul’s mission
a. Not only peculiar to Paul; most sikat
b. Very much conncected with Jeruslem Church
§ He did not see jesus in flesh
§ He was ex persecutor
5. Difference of Acts and Letters
a. Chronology
i. Acts: Council of Jerusalem, Paul reports every after mission
Letters: solo si paul
b. Apostolic Style
i. Acts – Paul master talker
Letters – not a talker
ii. Acts – works signs and wonders
Letters – preaching about the cross
iii. Acts – relation and dependence on Jerusalem church
Letters – minimized dependence
iv. Acts – observant Jew
Letters – observant Gentile
v. Acts – prophetic tradition
Letters – suffering for ministry
c. Theology
i. Acts: Prosopopaea
à Luke’s theology on Paul’s mouth
Letters: Paul’s own theology in letters
6. OVERall: Paul, apostle, gentile, prophe
Acts -- > God is faithful to his promises
Letters Introduction
1. Paul Ministry Patters
a. From urban to rural
b. Works with team
c. Used letters to cordinate
2. Elements of Composition
a. Emenuensis – secretary
b. Works with others
c. Pauline school
1. “I am”
a. Book of Signs: “I am the predicate”
b. Book of Glory: “I am”; Moses echo; irony Jesus’ suffers
2. Xtology: high (starts with logos)
3. Minipoints
a. Explicated the implied themes of synoptics (e.g. Jesus as God)
b. Jesus seems not human: more human since he cried, he asks for love
c. Theological reflection in narrative form
d. Philosophical
e. Naming Jesus makes the namer subordinate (John the Baptist); He named himself… I am.
f. Symbol: Jesus himself is the symbol of heaven realities as kingdom of heaven is to synoptics
g. Full of irony: characters say things without realizing the weight of their words à reader elevation. (e.g. Pontius Pilate “What is the truth?”
Johanin Letters
- regarding the inner conflict within the community
- 1st John: doctrinal and moral disagreements; more of a homily
- 2nd John: proper teachings
- 3rd John: political teachings
Revelation
- not a foretelling, apocaplyptic literature
a. persecution literature
b. esoteric code
c. seems to foretell but it is intended for the present
d. God is incontrol of History
§ Good-evil = won already
§ Suffering = part of God’s plan
§ Human history has a goal = judgment
§ Sufferers with Xt will share in his glory
- realized eschatology - a saved already (e.g. Corinthians’ )
- very Jewish: suffering speeds up actualization of God’s glory
- made sense to its first audience – the persecuted
- read, think metaphorically
ACTS
1. Pattern of Moses’ Story
- Moses in weakness, rejected (Jesus human weakness)
- Moses in power, rejected (Jesus resurrection and HSP)
- Rejected are rejected (move to Gentiles
2. doubtful Gentiles:
a. Is god faithful to his promises?
à Luke: fulfilled in the restored Israel (jews who accepted Jesus)
b. Sino and leader? Sanhedrin or apostles
à Apostles may power and authority
3. Tower of Babel vs. PENTECOST
a. story of arrogance and pride vs. story of hope
b. division/barrier vs. unitive
c. divided vs. preached
4. Paul’s mission
a. Not only peculiar to Paul; most sikat
b. Very much conncected with Jeruslem Church
§ He did not see jesus in flesh
§ He was ex persecutor
5. Difference of Acts and Letters
a. Chronology
i. Acts: Council of Jerusalem, Paul reports every after mission
Letters: solo si paul
b. Apostolic Style
i. Acts – Paul master talker
Letters – not a talker
ii. Acts – works signs and wonders
Letters – preaching about the cross
iii. Acts – relation and dependence on Jerusalem church
Letters – minimized dependence
iv. Acts – observant Jew
Letters – observant Gentile
v. Acts – prophetic tradition
Letters – suffering for ministry
c. Theology
i. Acts: Prosopopaea
à Luke’s theology on Paul’s mouth
Letters: Paul’s own theology in letters
6. OVERall: Paul, apostle, gentile, prophe
Acts -- > God is faithful to his promises
Letters Introduction
1. Paul Ministry Patters
a. From urban to rural
b. Works with team
c. Used letters to cordinate
2. Elements of Composition
a. Emenuensis – secretary
b. Works with others
c. Pauline school

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home